The U.S. and Britain are incapable of controlling all of Iraq.

As soon as the legitimate Lebanese government is convinced that the conditions have ripened and that Lebanon is able to maintain stability on its own... Then, the Syrian forces will return to their homeland.

Today, the Iraqi citizen sees that America is coming and wants to occupy his country and kill him, and he is willing to experience for himself what happened in Palestine.

Israel does not care about the international public opinion.

But the issue has to do with land, which is our land.

When we analyze this war in a materialistic way and ask when is it going to end and who will be the winner and the loser, it means that we do not see the endgame.

No doubt that the U.S. is a super-power capable of conquering a relatively small country, but is it able to control it?

The most significant indicator that there is no disaster in Iraq is the fact that there is no exodus.

When our interests matched, the Americans have been good to us, and when the interests differed, they wanted us to mold ourselves to them, which we refused.

The Israeli lobby has clout in the U.S., which means that re-arranging the region and controlling its resources one way or another, will serve Israel through its control over the American administration.

Worry does not mean fear, but readiness for the confrontation.

The problem is not the occupation, but how people deal with it.

We, in Syria, our point of view stems from our experience.

Israel ranks her priorities in the following way: security, land, and water.

As far as we are concerned, we Syria have not changed.

Israeli interests are not necessarily in harmony with the American interests.

It would be a mistake to link anything that Israel does to a certain circumstance. And it is a mistake to feel comfortable in any circumstance just because Israel did not act on it.

When Lebanon started its resistance it was a small and divided country.

We believe that Lebanon has been the first real experience for all the Arabs.

Armies are not only for offensives.

It should be known that Israel is based on treachery.

Despite the ethnic diversity within each nation, the social fabric of the region by and large is one.

You in Lebanon, your power is no match to Israel. Israel, militarily, is more powerful than you and maybe it is more powerful than all the Arab countries, or most of them.

It is even more so when it comes to Iraq, which is a large Arab country with scientific, material, and human resources and is able to accomplish, at the least, what Lebanon accomplished, and more.

We are dealing with treachery and threats, which accompanied the establishment of Israel.

The U.S. and Britain are incapable of controlling all of Iraq.

Since its very inception, Israel has been a threat.

Hizbullah is not a militia.

It is natural that we should always expect an Israeli attack, even when it does not threaten.

America is interested in re-arranging the region as it sees fit.

The logical thing is to implement the Arab Defense Agreement.

Lebanon was under Israeli occupation, up to its capital, but we did not consider that a disaster. Why? Because it was very clear that there are ways to resist.

None of us and none of the Arabs trust Israel.

Is there an equality of power between America and Iraq? Definitely not; however, the Iraqi people are standing fast and are defending their land courageously.

I am Syrian, I was made in Syria, I have to live in Syria and die in Syria.

Syria is geographically and politically in the middle of the Middle East.

The problem with the West is that they start with political reform going towards democracy. If you want to go towards democracy, the first thing is to involve the people in decision making, not to make it.

We have more difficult circumstances than most of the Arab countries but in spite of that Syria is stable. Why? Because you have to be very closely linked to the beliefs of the people. This is the core issue.

You cannot reform your society or institution without opening your mind.

Its not exactly fair to make a mistake yourself and then start blaming others for it.

But for us, in Syria, we have principles. We'll do anything to prevent the region from another crazy war. It's not only Syria. Because it will start in Syria.

We must support initiatives that provide clear, concrete measures and milestones that our troops need for defeating the insurgency, building up Iraqi security forces, and handing over Iraq to the Iraqi people.

Before and during the first phase of the war his administration repeatedly maligned the UN but now, that Iraq has turned into a quagmire, it is asking the UN for help.

Athletes as role models and heroes is a hoax, a sick hoax. The men and women who are fighting in Iraq, they are the true heroes.

But in the first Gulf war the United Kingdom was not under any threat from Iraq, and is still less so in the second one. Then there is no justification for obstructing freedom of information, particularly as nations have a right to know what their soldiers are being used for.

As I think through the issue of funding the rebuilding of Iraq, I think about the analogy of a bankruptcy proceeding. There is no doubt that Iraq as a country is bankrupt.

Our brave soldiers and support personnel are engaged in a battle as important as any the United States has ever before waged, for the success of democracy in Iraq is a crucial test of the ideals this Nation was founded upon.

The situation in Iraq will be long, it will be expensive and it will be difficult. But in the end, Iraq will very much be worth it.

It's true that the war in Iraq opened a distance in relations between part of Europe and the U.S. government, but our basic ties are stronger than that. We share democracy, free markets and a commitment to Western security. We differ on how to guarantee that security.